Here are some examples of agree or disagree essay questions.
1. “Modern life is increasingly chaotic.” Do you agree or disagree?
2. “The death penalty is barbaric and should not be legal anywhere.” Do you agree or disagree?
3. “Libraries are irrelevant in the age of the internet and should not be publicly funded.” Do you agree or disagree?
As an illustration, I’m going to discuss the third of these examples.
I’m going to argue that libraries are not irrelevant in the age of the internet, partly because (as a scholar and teacher of English) that’s what I believe.
It is possible to argue a case opposite to your own real opinion, but you are more likely to argue convincingly if you argue for a case in which you yourself believe.
“Libraries are irrelevant in the age of the internet and should not be publicly funded.” Do you agree or disagree?
Here, it’s essential to note that the view with which you’re being asked to agree or disagree actually consists of two views:
“Libraries are irrelevant in the age of the internet”;
“Libraries should not be publicly funded.”
The two questions are linked, but not identical.
Let’s consider an unclear statement of opinion.
“I suppose libraries are in some ways irrelevant, you can find most things you need on the internet, but after all it is good to have a place to go and study, and many libraries also offer other facilities like cafes etc.”
What is the problem with this way of stating an opinion?
First, the statement of opinion is indecisive, because it is prefaced with “I suppose”.
It is usually a bad idea to preface your statement of opinion with “I suppose”, or “it is my opinion that”, or even “I think that”.
The reader already knows that it is your opinion, because you are stating it!
Every time you are tempted to write “I think that” or “It’s my opinion that”, try simply deleting those words.
The sentence will usually be greatly improved without them.
The other problem with this way of opening your argument is that it is unclear which side you are on.
After the reader has finished reading the opening sentence, it is not fully clear whether the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement offered.
This is not to say that there is no room for subtlety or qualifications to an argument in your essay.
But the main line of your argument needs to be clear, because you don’t have much space. Let’s try to find a better opening for the essay.
“Libraries are very far from irrelevant. The experience of reading a printed book is very different from that of reading a text on a screen, and much more is lost than is sometimes supposed when reading electronically.”
This is clear and decisive statement of opinion. A single line of argument is given, followed by a single main supporting reason for it.
Let’s move on the second main criterion, addressing all parts of the question.
Remember that you’re being asked not only whether libraries are irrelevant, but also whether they should receive public funding (vocabulary like this is great for your essay).
Obviously these two questions are linked: if libraries were irrelevant, their really would be no point in funding them.
Yet it does not follow that, if relevant, they must be funded. It’s good to demonstrate your awareness that the question has more than one aspect to it.
Here is an example of how you might do this.
“We have seen that libraries are very far from irrelevant. Clearly, this fact does not, by itself, show that they deserve public funding. Nevertheless, a good case can, in fact, be made for public financial support for libraries.”
With this transition between the first and second aspects of the question, you have done a number of things.
You have shown that you have read the question attentively, and have understood that it consists of two distinct parts.
You have also shown that you understand the need to provide support for your opinion on each part of the statement asked about.
Finally, let’s move on to the third criterion, the need fully to support your opinion.
Evidently, you are not expected to be an expert on any topic about which you might be asked to give your opinion.
You are not expected, for example, to have precise facts and figures about library use at your fingertips!
But you are being asked to show that you understand the general principle of the need to support opinions with reasons, with evidence of some kind.
Let’s consider what might count as supporting the argument that libraries are not irrelevant in the internet age. You would need to be able to show what it is that libraries provide that a computer screen can’t.
Here, “supporting” your argument might simply mean describing some of the valuable features of reading a book which can’t be reproduced by a computer.
Let’s consider an example of how this might be done.
“Not all the merits of books are replicable on a computer screen. Not only are books one of the simplest technologies ever invented, and therefore extremely easy to use, but they are also physical sites of memory. Many readers remember what they have read in a book by remembering the look, feel and even smell of a book as they have read it.”
Watch this tutorial on how to give examples, then click here to subscribe to the Youtube Channel.
This series of supporting arguments has a number of virtues. It points to a number of different specific ways in which books do things which can’t be done by computers; each of these features of books constitutes an implicit reason for valuing libraries.
It draws on the experiences of readers to support a more abstract general point about libraries.
In this tutorial, we have considered some of the main criteria for success in an “agree or disagree” essay.
We have understood the importance of:
1. addressing all aspects of the question;
2. stating one’s opinion clearly and decisively;
3. offering full support for all aspects of one’s opinion.
You can download or listen to the audio version here: